膜科学与技术

ClassificationCode：:X703

year,volume(issue):pagination： 2015,35(6):126-133

Abstract：

Membrane bioreactor (MBR) effluent quality and operation energy consumption are affected by hydraulic condition combined with biochemical reactions. Studyingthe biochemical reaction process while taking the hydraulic effect into account is of great significance in operating a MBR steadily and energy–efficiently.Activated sludge model (ASM) and computational fluid dynamics (CFD) modeling applied in MBR process have been reviewed in terms of biological– hydraulic field simulation.The reviewed results showed that ASM–CFD integrated modeling were capable to simulate the MBR biological– hydraulic fieldwith short sludge residence time(SRT), and gave accurate and abundant information of flow field and sewage species concentration distribution. ASM–CFD integrated modeling was thus believed to be a powerful tool for MBR research, design and application. However, there were few publications on MBR modeling based on ASM–CFD,further detailed research needs to be developed.

Funds：

国家自然科学基金项目（51278483）；国家水体污染控制与治理科技重大专项 (2012ZX07203-002)

AuthorIntro：

杨敏（1988~）, 男, 湖南益阳人, 博士研究生, 主要研究方向是膜分离技术的数值模拟与优化.

Reference：

[1] Judd S. The MBR Book——Principles and Applications of Membrane Bioreactors for Water and Wastewater Treatment[M]. UK: Elsevier, 2011.12-14.
[2] US EPA. Nitrogen Control Manual[M]. Washington, D.C., 1993.1-20.
[3] Martin C, Vanrolleghem PA. Analysing, completing, and generating influent data for WWTP modelling: A critical review[J]. Environmental Modelling & Software, 2014,60(1): 188–201.
[4] Coen F, Petersen B, Vanrolleghem PA, et al. Model–Based Characterisation of Hydraulic, Kinetic and Influent Properties of an Industrial WWTP[J]. Water Science and Technology, 1998,37(12): 317–326.
[5] Langergraber G, Rieger L, Winkler S, et al. A Guideline for Simulation Studies of Wastewater Treatment Plants[J]. Water Science and Technology, 2004, 50(7): 131–138.
[6] DeClercq B, Coen F, Vanderhaegen B, et al. Calibrating Simple Models for Mixing and Flow Propagation in Waste Water Treatment Plants[J]. Water Science and Technology, 1999,39(4): 61–69.
[7] Lee T, Wang F, Newell R. Dynamic simulation of bioreactor systems using orthogonal collocation on finite elements[J]. Computers & chemical engineering, 1999,23(9): 1247–1262.
[8] 孙培德, 宋英琦, 王如意. 活性污泥动力学模型及数值模拟导论[M]. 北京: 化学工业出版社, 2010: 255. 131-141.
[9] 宋英琦, 孙培德, 王如意. 活性污泥系统生物场–水力场–温度场耦合模型（ FCASM3–Hydro–Temp）Ⅱ模型校验[J]. 环境科学学报, 2008,28(12): 2442–2448.
[10]朱红钧. Fluent 12 流体分析及仿真[M]. 北京: 清华大学出版社, 2011. 87-92.
[11] ANSYS Inc. FLUENT Theory Guide[M]. The United States: PERA GLOBAL, 2014. 253-299.
[12] Brannock M W D. Computational fluid dynamics tools for the design of mixed anoxic wastewater treatment vessels[D]. Brisbane : University of Queensland, 2003. 38-46.
[13] Wang Y. Evaluation of membrane bioreactor mixing performance via computational fluid dynamics modelling[D]. New South Wales: The University of New South Wales, 2010. 88-110.
[14] Lei L, Ni J. Three–dimensional three–phase model for simulation of hydrodynamics, oxygen mass transfer, carbon oxidation, nitrification and denitrification in an oxidation ditch[J]. Water Research, 2014,53(4): 200–214.
[15] Wang X, Ding J, Guo W Q, et al. A hydrodynamics–reaction kinetics coupled model for evaluating bioreactors derived from CFD simulation[J]. Bioresource Technology, 2010,101(24): 9749–9757.
[16]Wang X, Jia X, Wen J. Transient CFD modeling of toluene waste gas biodegradation in a gas–liquid–solid three–phase airlift loop reactor by immobilized Pseudomonas putida[J]. Chemical Engineering Journal, 2011,172(2–3): 735–745.
[17] Jajuee B, Margaritis A, Karamanev D, et al. Measurements and CFD simulations of gas holdup and liquid velocity in novel airlift membrane contactor[J]. AIChE Journal, 2006,52(12): 4079–4089.
[18] Naessens W, Maere T, Ratkovich N, et al. Critical review of membrane bioreactor models – Part 2: Hydrodynamic and integrated models[J]. Bioresource Technology, 2012,122: 107–118.
[19] Wei P, Zhang K, Gao W, et al. CFD modeling of hydrodynamic characteristics of slug bubble flow in a flat sheet membrane bioreactor[J]. Journal of Membrane Science, 2013,445(10): 15–24.
[20] Ndinisa N, Wiley D, Fletcher D. Computational fluid dynamics simulations of Taylor bubbles in tubular membranes: model validation and application to laminar flow systems[J]. Chemical Engineering Research and Design, 2005,83(1): 40–49.
[21] Böhm L, Drews A, Prieske H, et al. The importance of fluid dynamics for MBR fouling mitigation[J]. Bioresource Technology, 2012,122(10): 50–61.
[22] Le Moullec Y, Potier O, Gentric C, et al. Activated sludge pilot plant: comparison between experimental and predicted concentration profiles using three different modelling approaches[J]. Water Research, 2011,45(10): 3085–3097.
[23] Brannock M, Leslie G, Wang Y, et al. Optimising mixing and nutrient removal in membrane bioreactors: CFD modelling and experimental validation[J]. Desalination, 2010,250(2): 815–818.
[24]谢浩. 氧化沟液_固两相CFD模拟及ASM模型耦合研究[D].武汉: 华中科技大学, 2013. 16-38.
[25] Henze M, Grady C P L, Gujer W, et al. Activated Sludge Model No.1 IAWPRC Scientific and Technical Report No.1[R]. London (GB): 1987.
[26] Henze M. Activated sludge models: ASM1, ASM2, ASM2d and ASM3[M]. The Kingdom of Netherlands: International Water Association, 2000. 1-10.
[27] Zuthi M F, Ngo H H, Guo W S. Modelling bioprocesses and membrane fouling in membrane bioreactor (MBR): a review towards finding an integrated model framework[J]. Bioresource Technology, 2012,122: 119–129.
[28] Chaize S, Huyard A. Membrane bioreactors on domestic wastewater treatment sludge production and modelling approach[J]. Water Science and Technology, 1991,23: 1591–1600.
[29] Tao J, Liu X, Kennedy M D, et al. Calibrating a side–stream membrane bioreactor using Activated Sludge Model No. 1[J]. Water Science and Technology, 2005,52(10–11): 359–367.
[30] Henze, Mogens, Gujer W, et al. Activated sludge models ASM1, ASM2, ASM2d and ASM3[M]. 2006. 20-32.
[31] Hulsbeek J J W, Kruit J, Roeleveld P J, et al. A practical protocol for dynamic modeling of activated sludge systems[J]. Water Science and Technology, 2002,45(6): 127 –136.
[32] Delrue F, Racault Y, Choubert J M, et al. Modelling a full scale membrane bioreactor using activated sludge model no.1: challenges and solutions[J]. Water Science and Technology, 2010,62(10): 2205–2217.
[33] Hocaoglu S M, Insel G, Ubay C E, et al. Effect of sludge age on simultaneous nitrification and denitrification in membrane bioreactor[J]. Bioresource Technology, 2011,102(12): 6665–6672.
[34] Jiang T, Sin G, Spanjers H, et al. Comparison of the modeling approach between membrane bioreactor and conventional activated sludge processes[J]. Water Environment Research, 2009,81(4): 432–440.
[35] Parco V, du Toit G, Wentzel M, et al. Biological nutrient removal in membrane bioreactors: denitrification and phosphorus removal kinetics[J]. Water Science and Technology, 2007,56(6): 125–134.
[36] Spérandio M, Espinosa M C. Modelling an aerobic submerged membrane bioreactor with ASM models on a large range of sludge retention time[J]. Desalination, 2008,231(1–3): 82–90.
[37] Itokawa H, Thiemig C, Pinnekamp J. Design and operating experiences of municipal MBRs in Europe[J]. Water Science and Technology, 2008,58(12): 2319–2327.
[38] Urbain V, Mobarry B, De Silva V, et al. Integration of performance, molecular biology and modeling to describe the activated sludge process[J]. Water Science and Technology, 1998,37(4): 223–229.
[39] Lu S G, Imai T, Ukita M, et al. A model for membrane bioreactor process based on the concept of formation and degradation of soluble microbial products[J]. Water Research, 2001,35(8): 2038–2048.
[40] Fenu A, Guglielmi G, Jimenez J, et al. Activated sludge model (ASM) based modelling of membrane bioreactor (MBR) processes: a critical review with special regard to MBR specificities[J]. Water Research, 2010,44(15): 4272–4294.
[41] Tian Y, Chen L, Zhang S, et al. A systematic study of soluble microbial products and their fouling impacts in membrane bioreactors[J]. Chemical Engineering Journal, 2011,168(3): 1093–1102.
[42] Janus T, Ulanicki B. Modelling SMP and EPS formation and degradation kinetics with an extended ASM3 model[J]. Desalination, 2010,261(1–2): 117–125.
[43] Luedeking R, Piret E L. A kinetic study of the lactic acid fermentation. Batch process at controlled pH[J]. Journal of Biochemical and Microbiological Technology and Engineering, 1959,1(4): 393–412.
[44] Anderson J D. Computational fluid dynamics[M]. United States of America: R. R. Donnelley & Sons Company, 1995. 85-114.
[45] Harris C K, Roekaerts D, Rosendal F J J, et al. Computational fluid dynamics for chemical reactor engineering[J]. Chemical Engineering Science, 1996,51(10): 1569–1594.
[46] 张晴, 樊耀波, 魏源送, 等. CFD及ASM–CFD在MBR研究中的应用进展[J]. 膜科学与技术, 2013,33(2): 95–103.
[47] Martinelli L, Guigui C, Line A. Characterisation of hydrodynamics induced by air injection related to membrane fouling behaviour[J]. Desalination, 2010,250(2): 587–591.
[48] Brannock M W D, De Wever H, Wang Y, et al. Computational fluid dynamics simulations of MBRs: Inside submerged versus outside submerged membranes[J]. Desalination, 2009,236(1–3): 244–251.
[49] Jalilvand Z, Zokaee A F, Fouladitajar A, et al. Computational fluid dynamics modeling and experimental study of continuous and pulsatile flow in flat sheet microfiltration membranes[J]. Journal of Membrane Science, 2014,450(1): 207–214.
[50] Prieske H, Bohm L, Drews A, et al. Optimised hydrodynamics for membrane bioreactors with immersed flat sheet membrane modules[J]. Desalination and Water Treatment, 2010,18(1–3): 270–276.
[51] Prieske H, Drews A, Kraume M. Prediction of the circulation velocity in a membrane bioreactor[J]. Desalination, 2008,231(1–3): 219–226.
[52] Kang C W, Hua J S, Lou J, et al. Bridging the gap between membrane bio–reactor (MBR) pilot and plant studies[J]. Journal of Membrane Science, 2008,325(2): 861–871.
[53] Zhang Q, Xu R L, Zheng X, et al. Simulation and optimization of airlift external circulation membrane bioreactor using computationalfluid dynamics[J]. Water Science and Technology, 2013,69(9): 1846–1852.
[54] Wibisono Y, Cornelissen E R, Kemperman A J B, et al. Two–phase flow in membrane processes: A technology with a future[J]. Journal of Membrane Science, 2014,453(3): 566–602.
[55] Wintgens T, Rosen J, Melin T, et al. Modelling of a membrane bioreactor system for municipal wastewater treatment[J]. Journal of Membrane Science, 2003,216(1–2): 55–65.
[56] Busch J, Cruse A, Marquardt W. Modeling submerged hollow–fiber membrane filtration for wastewater treatment[J]. Journal of Membrane Science, 2007,288(1–2): 94–111.
[57] Stamou A I. Modelling of oxidation ditches using an open channel flow 1–D advection–dispersion equation and ASM1 process description[J]. Water Science and Technology, 1997,36(5): 269–276.
[58] Littleton H X, Daigger G T, Strom P F. Application of Computational Fluid Dynamics to Closed–Loop Bioreactors: II. Simulation of Biological Phosphorus Removal Using Computational Fluid Dynamics[J]. Water Environment Research, 2007,79(6): 613–624.
[59] 贾晓强. 气液固三相生物反应器流动与降酚特性动态行为研究[D].天津: 天津大学, 2008. 28-37.
[60] Zima P, Makinia J, Swinarski M, et al. Combining Computational Fluid Dynamics with a Biokinetic Model for Predicting Ammonia and Phosphate Behavior in Aeration Tanks[J]. Water Environment Research, 2009,81(11): 2353–2362.
[61] Garcia O F, Gomez E. Bioreactor scale–up and oxygen transfer rate in microbial processes: An overview[J]. Biotechnology Advances, 2009,27(2): 153–176.
[62] Pittoors E, Guo Y, Van Hulle S W H. Oxygen transfer model development based on activated sludge and clean water in diffused aerated cylindrical tanks[J]. Chemical Engineering Journal, 2014,243: 51–59.
[63] 陈敏恒, 丛德滋, 方图南, 等. 化工原理（下册）[M]. 第三版.北京: 化学工业出版社, 2006. 7-20.

Service：

【Download】【Collect】

《膜科学与技术》编辑部 Address: Bluestar building, 19 east beisanhuan road, chaoyang district, Beijing; 100029 Postal code; Telephone：010-80492417/010-80485372; Fax：010-80485372 ; Email：mkxyjs@163.com