| Mechanism of composite fouling and optimization of maintenance cleaning for MBR membranes |
| Authors: WANG Haiyang1, WANG Weihong1, LOU Qiang2, WU Yiping2 |
| Units: 1. College of Water Conservancy and Civil Engineering, Xinjiang Agricultural University, Urumqi 830052, China; 2. Xinjiang Kunlun New Water Source Hexi Water Affairs Co., Ltd., Urumqi 830000, China |
| KeyWords: MBR process; membrane fouling; chemically enhanced backwash (CEB); membrane flux |
| ClassificationCode:TQ028; X505 |
| year,volume(issue):pagination: 2026,46(1):96-105 |
|
Abstract: |
|
Overcoming membrane fouling is central to ensuring the long-term, stable operation of membrane bioreactor (MBR) processes while minimizing energy consumption and operational costs. The mechanisms governing fouling regeneration and evolution following online maintenance cleaning (CEB) are particularly complex. To elucidate the fouling mechanisms in an A2/O-MBR plant in Xinjiang after four years of operation and to optimize the engineering cleaning strategy, this study systematically characterized membrane foulants using scanning electron microscopy (SEM), in-situ Raman spectroscopy, X-ray fluorescence (XRF) and Fourier-transform infrared spectroscopy (FTIR). Results indicated that inorganic and heavy metal foulants primarily consisted of Cd, Si, Al and As. The organic fouling comprised a gradient composite layer with a gel network of proteins, polysaccharides and lipids stabilized by a recalcitrant aromatic framework of humic-like substances. A dense residual layer of cross-linked proteins and humic acids on the membrane surface post-CEB was identified as the root cause of rapid fouling recurrence. Based on the mechanism of this composite cross-linked fouling network, a precise cleaning strategy of “oxidation-dominated, acid-assisted, high-frequency short-duration and on-demand triggering” was proposed. The optimized bench-scale protocol effectively mitigated fouling, increasing the average membrane flux by 29.0% compared to the original, and demonstrating high removal efficiency for scaling elements. This enables immediate flux enhancement and fouling control, providing theoretical and practical support for optimizing full-scale cleaning strategies. ? |
|
Funds: |
| 新疆水利工程安全与水灾害防治重点实验室(ZDSYS-YJS-2024-08) |
|
AuthorIntro: |
| 汪海洋(2001-),安徽六安人,主要研究方向为水处理与污水资源化利用 |
|
Reference: |
|
[1]郑祥,魏源送,王志伟.中国水处理行业可持续发展战略研究报告[M].北京:中国人民大学出版社,2019:230. [2]Fuller M E, Hedman P C, Chu K H, et al. Effective treatment of energetic containing wastewater in a sequential anaerobic-aerobic membrane bioreactor (MBR) system - Part 1: Treatment of IMX-104 wastewater[J]. Chemosphere, 2025, 364: 144-156. [3]任堋搏,苏雷,刘智,等.农村污水处理技术的研究进展[J/OL].清洗世界,2025. [4]马静怡,刘晓倩,赵祺鹏,等.动态膜生物反应器在废水处理中的研究进展与应用现状[J].水处理技术,2025,51(10):124-131,139. [5]He J, He C, Wang Y, et al. Optimization of coagulation process and its influence on membrane fouling for anaerobic-anoxic-oxic-anoxic membrane bioreactor (A<sup>2</sup>O-MBR)[J]. J Environ Sci, 2024, 157: 12-15. [6]Liu S Y, Song W L, Meng M L, et al. Engineering pressure retarded osmosis membrane bioreactor (PRO-MBR) for simultaneous water and energy recovery from municipal wastewater [J]. Sci Total Environ, 2022, 828: 148-154. [7]Wang Y, Zhang H, Li J, et al. Controlling sludge retention time to alleviate inhibition of nitrosation and nitration by accumulated aluminum in an A/O-MBR[J]. J Environ Sci, 2025, 158: 17-21. [8]张帅.基于膜生物反应器(MBR)的污水处理效能提升关键技术研究[J].现代工程科技,2025,4(13):85-88. [9]Lin H, Chen J, Wang F, et al. A review on the mechanism, impacts and control methods of membrane fouling in MBR system[J]. Membranes, 2020, 10(2): 24. [10]Wang J, Wang X, Zhang K, et al. Effects of hydraulic retention time on process performance of anaerobic side-stream reactor coupled membrane bioreactors: Kinetic model, sludge reduction mechanism and microbial community structures[J]. Bioresour Technol, 2018, 270: 151-158. [11]吴永惠,黄健平,张慧如,等.膜清洗技术研究进展[J].河南化工,2025,42(4):8-12. [12]Mei X, Wang Z, Miao Y, et al. Membrane fouling mechanism of biofilm-membrane bioreactor (BF-MBR): Pore blocking model and membrane cleaning[J]. Bioresour Technol, 2018, 250: 398-405. [13]汤凯,宋灿辉,曹茜斐,等.低耗往复式膜生物反应器系统在城镇污水处理厂的中试应用研究[J/OL].中国环境科学,2025. [14]刘雅娟.浸没式PAC-AMBRs系统中PAC缓解膜污染的研究进展[J].化工进展,2023,42(1): 457-468. [15]Meng F, Zhang S, Oh Y, et al. Identification of fouling mechanisms in MBRs at constant flowrate: model applications and SEM-EDX characterizations[J]. Water Sci Technol, 2018, 77(5): 1224-1233. [16]Jegatheesan V, Pramanik B K, Chen M, et al. Assessing membrane fouling and the performance of pilot-scale membrane bioreactor (MBR) to treat real municipal wastewater during winter season in Nordic regions[J]. Sci Total Environ, 2017, 595: 1221-1229. [17]李香磊.水处理设备维护及改进探索[J].现代工业经济和信息化,2017,7(19): 47-48. [18]Zhao R, Wang Y, Li X, et al. Effects of NaClO shock on MBR performance under continuous operating conditions[J]. Environ Sci: Water Res Technol, 2021, 7(1): 280-290. [19]孙剑宇. 膜生物反应器城市污水处理工艺优化运行与节能降耗研究 [D]. 北京:清华大学, 2016. [20]王郑伟,刘广波,陈泽滨,等.广州市某净水厂MBR膜丝检测及清洗优化[J].中国给水排水,2024,40(3):89-94. [21]田文瑞,胡以松,王晓昌.MBR中膜面泥饼层的特性表征及控制方法研究进展[J].膜科学与技术,2016,36(2):141-147. [22]陈瑶,朱孟建,刘大伟,等.膜生物反应技术在环境污水处理中的应用探析[J].清洗世界,2025,41(12):15-17. [23]蔡祥.MBR中表面形态对膜污染影响的界面作用机制研究[D].金华:浙江师范大学,2018. [24]Liu Q, Wang X, Li Y, et al. Membrane fouling in aerobic granular sludge (AGS)-membrane bioreactor (MBR): effect of AGS size[J]. Water Res, 2019, 147: 314-325. |
|
Service: |
| 【Download】【Collect】 |
《膜科学与技术》编辑部 Address: Bluestar building, 19 east beisanhuan road, chaoyang district, Beijing; 100029 Postal code; Telephone:010-80492417/010-80485372; Fax:010-80485372 ; Email:mkxyjs@163.com
京公网安备11011302000819号