膜科学与技术

位置：首页 >> 期刊内容阅读

RO、NF与MD去除水中五种微量药物的效能研究

作者：葛四杰曲丹封莉张立秋

单位：北京林业大学,环境科学与工程学院，北京 100083

关键词：反渗透；纳滤；膜蒸馏；药物

DOI号：

分类号： TQ028.8

出版年,卷(期):页码： 2013,33(3):75-80

摘要：

本文以水体中经常暴露的五种微量药物污染物：酰胺咪嗪（CBZ）、酮洛芬（KEP）、萘普生（NAP）、双氯芬酸（DCF）和扑热息痛（ACE）为研究对象，考察了反渗透（RO）、纳滤（NF）、膜蒸馏（MD）三种膜分离技术对五种目标药物的去除效果。试验结果表明：RO与MD两种膜分离技术对五种目标药物均能高效地去除，其中MD工艺出水中五种目标药物均未检出；RO工艺出水中，CBZ、KEP、NAP和DCF四种药物也未检出，基本实现了完全去除，ACE的去除率略低，但也达到了96.5%；相对而言，NF工艺对五种目标药物的去除效果稍差，其对CBZ、KEP、NAP、DCF和ACE的去除率分别为60.5±0.5%、82.3±0.7%、84.2±0.4%、83.5±1%、41.1±0.2%。

This paper investigated the removal efficiency of five trace pharmaceuticals, including carbamazepine（CBZ）, ketoprofen (KEP), naproxene (NAP), diclofenac (DCF) and acetaminophen (ACE), which were detected frequently in aquatic environment, by reverse osmosis (RO), nanofiltration (NF) and membrane distillation (MD). The results show that RO and MD can remove these five selected drugs efficiently. During MD process, none of these pharmaceuticals was detected in the permeate; CBZ, KEP, NAP and DCF by RO process were not detected in the permeate neither，which were almost completely removed. The removal efficiency of ACE was slightly lower, but it was also up to 96.5 %. However, NF process had lower efficiency than MD and RO processes for removing drugs. The removal efficiency of KEP, NAP, DCF and ACE were 60.5±0.5%, 82.3±0.7%, 84.2±0.4%, 83.5±1%, 41.1±0.2% respectively.

基金项目：

中央高校基本科研业务费专项基金（YX2011-12，TD2011-22，BLJC200903）；国家自然科学基金项目(51178046)，教育部新世纪优秀人才项目(NCEF-08-0732)

作者简介：

葛四杰(1989-)，男，安徽宿州人，硕士研究生，Tel：15110286904，E-mail:ge_sijie@126.com。主要研究方向为环境污染控制理论与技术*通讯作者：封莉，女，副教授，硕士生导师，E-mail:fengli_hit@163.com，北京市海淀区清华东路35号北京林业大学环境科学与工程学院主楼227室，10083；

参考文献：

[1] Li Wang, Guang-Guo Ying, Jian-Liang Zhao. Occurrence and risk assessment of acidic pharmaceuticals in the Yellow River, Hai River and Liao River of north China[J];Science of the Total Environment,2010,408(16):3139-3147.
[2] 叶计朋,邹世春,张干,等.典型抗生素类药物在珠江三角洲水体中的污染特征[J].生态环境,2007,16(2): 384-388.
[3]Rabiet.M, Togola.A, Brissaud.F,et al. Consequences of treated water recycling as regards pharmaceuticals and drugs in surface and ground waters of a medium sized mediterranean catchment. Environmental Science and Technology,2006,40 (17):5282-5288
[4]Zühlke.S,Dünnbier.U,Heberer.T. Detection and identification of phenazone-type drugs and their microbial metabometabolites in ground and drinking water applying solid- phase extraction and gas chromatography with mass spectrometric detection [J]. Journal of Chromatography A,2004.1050(2):201-209.
[5]Jones O A H, Voulvoulis N, Lester J N. Potential impact of pharmaceuticals on environmental health [J]. Bulletin of the World Health Organization. 2003. 81(10): 768-769.
[6]Crane M, Watts C, Boucard T. Chronic aquatic environmental risks from exposure to human pharmaceuticals [J].Science of the Total Environment. 2006.367(1): 23-41.
[7]时钧,袁权,高从堦.膜技术手册［M］.北京：化学工业出版社,2006:10-25.
[8]侯立安,刘晓芳.纳滤水处理应用研究现状与发展前景[J].膜科学与技术,2010,30(4):1-7
[9]王晓琳.反渗透和纳滤技术与应用[M].北京:化学工业出版社, 2005:298-387.
[10]李圭白,杨艳玲. 第三代城市饮用水净化工艺-超滤为核心技术的组合工艺[J].给水排水,2007,33(4):1-1.
[11]Heberer T, Feldmann D, Reddersen K,et al. Production of drinking water from highly contaminated surface waters : Removal of organic ,inorganic and microbial contaminants applying mobile membrane filtration units. Acta Hydrochimica et Hydrobiologica ,2002,30 (1):24-33.
[12]Radjenovic.J, Petrovic.M, Ventura.F, Barcelo.D. Rejection of pharmaceuticals in nanofiltration and reverse osmosis membrane drinking water treatment[J]. Water Research,2008,42(14):3601-3610.
[13]Verliefde A R D,Cornelissen E R,Heijman S G J,et al. The role of electrostatic interactions on the rejection of organic solutes in aqueous solutions with nanofiltration[J].Journal of Membrane Science,2008,322: 52-66.
[14]Kimura K, Amy G L, Drewes J, et al. Adsorption of hydrophobic compounds onto NF/RO membranes an artifact leading to overestimation of rejection[J].Journal of Membrane Science,2003,221:89-101.
[15]Mohammad Ali Zazouli, Heru Susanto, Simin Nasseri, Mathias Ulbricht. Influences of solution chemistry and polymeric natural organic matter on the removal of aquatic pharmaceutical residuals by nanofiltration[J].water research,2009,43:3270-3280.
[16]Shirra Gur-Reznik, Ifat Koren-Menashe, Lilly Heller-Grossman, Ofir Rufel, Carlos G. Dosoretz Influence of seasonal and operating conditions on the rejection of pharmaceutical active compounds by RO and NF membranes[J].Desalination,2011,277:250-256.
[17]黄裕,张晗,董秉直.纳滤膜去除卡马西平的影响因素研究[J].环境科学,2011.32(3):705-710.
[18]Comerton A M,Andrews R C,Bagley D M,et al. Membrane adsorption of endocrine disrupting compounds and pharmaceutically active compounds[J].Journal of Membrane Science,2007,303: 267-277.
[19]Yoon Y,Westerhoff P,Snyder S A,et al. Removal of endocrine disrupting compounds and pharmaceuticals by nanofiltration and ultrafiltration membranes[J].Desalination,2007,202:16-23.
[20]Edward A.McCallum, Hoon Hyung, Tien Anh Do, Ching-Hua Huang,Jae-Hong Kim. Adsorption,desorption,and steady-state removal of 17β-estradiol by nanofiltration membranes[J].Journal of Membrane Science,2008,319:38-43.
[21]Verliefde A R D,Cornelissen E R,Heijman S G J,et al. The role of electrostatic interactions on the rejection of organic solutes in aqueous solutions with nanofiltration[J].Journal of Membrane Science,2008,322: 52-66.
[22]Nghiem L D,Schfer AI,Elimelech M,et al. Pharmaceuticals retention mechanisms by nanofiltration membranes[J].Environmental Science and Technology,2005,39:7698-7705.
[23]María José López-Mu˜noz, Arcadio Sotto, Jesús M. Arsuaga, Bart Van der Bruggen.Influence of membrane,solute and solution properties on the retention of phenolic compounds in aqueous solution by nanofiltration membranes[J].Separation and Purification Technology,2009, 66:194-201.

服务与反馈：

【文章下载】【加入收藏】

《膜科学与技术》编辑部地址：北京市朝阳区北三环东路19号蓝星大厦邮政编码：100029 电话：010-64426130/64433466 传真：010-80485372邮箱：mkxyjs@163.com