膜科学与技术

位置：首页 >> 期刊内容阅读

腐殖酸-牛血清蛋白混合污染物的超滤膜污染行为

作者：冯敏，王磊，杨子晗，苗瑞，吕永涛

单位：西安建筑科技大学环境与市政工程学院,陕西省环境工程重点实验室,陕西省膜分离重点实验室,西安 710055

关键词：超滤膜；混合污染物；膜污染机理；微观作用力

DOI号：

分类号： TQ028.8

出版年,卷(期):页码： 2020,40(3):22-27

摘要：

本研究选用PVDF超滤膜，分别过滤牛血清蛋白（BSA）、腐殖酸（HA）单种污染物溶液及HA-BSA二元混合污染物溶液，结合相应污染物在膜面吸附行为及膜污染微观作用力，解析HA-BSA混合污染物的超滤膜污染行为。结果发现，相比于BSA，HA-BSA混合物引起的膜污染速率及不可逆污染明显减缓；相反，与HA相比，HA-BSA混合物加剧了膜污染速率及不可逆污染。这主要是由膜污染微观作用力差异引起：HA―PVDF < HA-BSA混合污染物―PVDF < BSA―PVDF，且混合污染物间作用力也明显大于HA―HA但小于BSA―BSA间作用力强度，这导致混合污染物在膜面的吸附累积速率及污染层密实度间于HA和BSA污染物之间，最终导致HA-BSA混合污染物引起的膜污染速率及不可逆污染大于HA污染膜，而小于BSA污染膜。

In this study, PVDF ultrafiltration membranes were used to filter the single pollutant solution of bovine serum albumin (BSA), humic acid (HA) and HA-BSA binary mixed pollutant solution, combined with the corresponding pollutant adsorption behavior on the membrane surface and the membrane. Contamination micro-force, analysis of ultrafiltration membrane pollution behavior of HA-BSA mixed pollutants. The results show that compared with BSA, the membrane fouling rate and irreversible pollution caused by the HA-BSA mixture are significantly slowed down; on the contrary, compared with HA, the HA-BSA mixture intensifies the membrane fouling rate and irreversible pollution. This is mainly caused by the difference in micro-effects of membrane pollution: HA-PVDF

基金项目：

陕西省科技创新引导专项(2018HJCG-18) ；陕西省重点科技创新团队计划（2017KCT-19-01）

作者简介：

第一作者简介：冯敏(1995- )，女，陕西西安人，硕士研究生，主要从事超滤膜制备与污染机制研究，E-mail:757770624@qq.com *通讯作者，E-mail: wl0178@126.com

参考文献：

[1]Qu F S, Liang H, Wang Z, et al. Ultrafiltration membrane fouling by extracellular organic matters (EOM) of Microcystis aeruginosa in stationary phase: influences of interfacial characteristics of foulants and fouling mechanisms [J]. Water research, 2012, 46(5): 1490-1500.
[2]黄健, 舒增年, 张四海. 亲水荷电超滤膜的制备及对腐殖酸的分离性能 [J]. 中国环境科学, 2014, 34 (11): 2831-2837.
[3]Dhakal N, Salinas-Rodriguez S G, Ouda A, et al. Fouling of ultrafiltration membranes by organic matter generated by marine algal species [J]. Journal of Membrane Science, 2018, 555: 418-428.
[4]Goh P S, Lau W J, Othman M H D, et al. Membrane fouling in desalination and its mitigation strategies [J]. Desalination, 2018, 425: 130-155.
[5]Liu Y, Mi B. Combined fouling of forward osmosis membranes: Synergistic foulant interaction and direct observation of fouling layer formation [J]. Journal of Membrane Science, 2012, 407: 136-144.
[6]Peiris R H, Jaklewicz M, Budman H, et al. Assessing the role of feed water constituents in irreversible membrane fouling of pilot-scale ultrafiltration drinking water treatment systems [J]. Water Research, 2013, 47 (10): 3364-3374.
[7]Shi X, Field R, Hankins N. Review of fouling by mixed feeds in membrane filtration applied to water purification [J]. Desalination and Water Treatment, 2011, 35(1-3): 68-81.
[8]Jermann D, Pronk W, Meylan S, et al. Interplay of different NOM fouling mechanisms during ultrafiltration for drinking water production [J]. Water Research, 2007, 41(8): 1713-1722.
[9]Ye Y, Clech P L, Chen V, et al. Fouling mechanisms of alginate solutions as model extracellular polymeric substances [J]. Desalination, 2005, 175(1): 7-20.
[10]Gu Y, Wang Y, Wei J, et al. Organic fouling of thin-film composite polyamide and cellulose triacetate forward osmosis membranes by oppositely charged macromolecules [J]. Water Research, 2013, 47(5): 1867-1874.
[11]Mahlangu T O, Thwala J M, Mamba B B, et al. Factors governing combined fouling by organic and colloidal foulants in cross-flow nanofiltration [J]. Journal of Membrane Science, 2015, 491: 53-62.
[12]Zularisam A W, Ahmad A, Sakinah M, et al. Role of natural organic matter (NOM), colloidal particles, and solution chemistry on ultrafiltration performance [J]. Separation & Purification Technology, 2011, 78(2): 189-200.
[13]Guan Y, Qian C, Chen W, et al. Interaction between humic acid and protein in membrane fouling process: A spectroscopic insight [J]. Water Research, 2018, 145: 146-152.
[14]Wang L, Miao R, Wang X, et al. Fouling behavior of typical organic foulants in polyvinylidene fluoride ultrafiltration membranes: characterization from microforces [J]. Environmental Science & Technology, 2013, 47(8): 3708-3714.
[15]Yamamura H, Kimura K, Okajima T, et al. Affinity of functional groups for membrane surfaces: implications for physically irreversible fouling [J]. Environmental Science and Technology, 2008, 42(14): 5310-5315.
[16]Miao R, Wang L, Lv Y, et al. Identifying polyvinylidene fluoride ultrafiltration membrane fouling behavior of different effluent organic matter fractions using colloidal probes [J]. Water Research, 2014, 55: 313-322.

服务与反馈：

【文章下载】【加入收藏】

《膜科学与技术》编辑部地址：北京市朝阳区北三环东路19号蓝星大厦邮政编码：100029 电话：010-64426130/64433466 传真：010-80485372邮箱：mkxyjs@163.com