膜科学与技术

位置：首页 >> 期刊内容阅读

不同截留分子量超微滤膜处理地表水中膜污染的对比研究

作者：郭永晖，李永国，王坚，桂波，郜阔

单位： 1.蓝星东丽膜科技（北京）有限公司，北京 101318；2.同济大学上海市四杨浦区四平路1239号200242；3.中国长江三峡集团有限公司长江生态环境工程研究中心（上海），上海 200335

关键词：超微；微滤；地表水；截留分子量；膜污染

DOI号：

分类号： TB324

出版年,卷(期):页码： 2022,42(5):139-145

摘要：

截留分子量是表征超微滤膜截留性能的重要参数，与膜污染行为密切相关。本文研究了150 kDa、3000 kDa两种不同截留分子量超微滤膜处理地表水过程的污染行为。研究结果表明，超微滤膜截留分子量越小，膜污染速率越低，不可逆污染占比越低。截留分子量小的超微滤膜，膜表面截留了更多的污染物，防止污染物进入膜孔内部，降低了不可逆污染程度。膜污染模式分析指出，截留分子量小的超微滤膜，污染行为更快的转换为滤饼层过滤模式，滤饼层可以进一步吸附截留水中污染物质，同时滤饼层更容易通过物理清洗去除，不可逆污染程度较低。

Molecular weight cut-off(MWCO) is an important parameter to characterize the cut-off performance of ultrafiltration membranes, which is closely related to membrane fouling behavior. In this paper, the fouling behavior of ultrafiltration membranes with different MWCO of 150 kDa and 3000 kDa in the process of treating surface water was studied. Results show that the ultrafiltration membrane with lower MWCO got lower fouling rate and irreversible fouling. The ultrafiltration membrane with lower MWCO retained more foulants on the membrane surface, prevented the foulant with high molecular weight from entering the inside of the membrane pores and reduced irreversible fouling. The analysis of the membrane fouling mode pointed out that the fouling behavior of the ultrafiltration membrane with lower MWCO changes to the cake layer filtration mode faster. The cake layer can further adsorb and retain foulant in the water. And the cake layer is easier to remove by physical cleaning, resulting lower irreversible fouling.

基金项目：

作者简介：

郭永晖（1970-），男，甘肃省兰州市人，工程师，研究方向为反渗透，超滤膜在水处理中的应用，guoyh@tbmc-bj.com

参考文献：

[1] 聂莉, 董秉直. 不同相对分子质量的有机物对膜通量的影响[J]. 中国环境科学, 2009, 29(10): 1086-1092.
[2] 孙丽华, 刘烨辉, 吕静静, 等. 不同超滤膜处理二级出水的膜污染机制研究[J]. 应用化工, 2020, 49(08): 1883-1887.
[3] Tian J, Ernst M, Cui F, et al. Correlations of relevant membrane foulants with UF membrane fouling in different waters[J]. Water Res, 2013, 47(3): 1218-1228.
[4] 杨海燕, 王灿, 鄢忠森, 等. 超滤处理东江水不可逆膜污染物的识别和活性炭对其吸附去除[J]. 环境科学, 2017, 38(4): 7.
[5] 韩洪蕊, 赵军强, 杨景, 等. PVDF/PAA-b-PMMA-b-PAA超滤膜的结构调控和性能评价[J]. 膜科学与技术, 2019, 39(2): 9.
[6] Koo C H, Mohammad A W, Talib M Z M. Review of the effect of selected physicochemical factors on membrane fouling propensity based on fouling indices[J]. Desalination, 2012, 287: 167-177.
[7] 罗欢刘广立刘杰倪晋仁. 不同超滤膜过滤天然有机物的膜污染特性研究[J]. 环境污染治理技术与设备, 2005(05): 46-50.
[8] Taniguchi M, Kilduff J E, Belfort G. Modes of Natural Organic Matter Fouling during Ultrafiltration[J]. Environ Sci Technol, 2003, 37(8): 1676-1683.
[9] 金鹏康, 吴鑫, 王晓昌. 不同截留分子量超滤膜污染过程分析[J]. 西安建筑科技大学学报(自然科学版), 2010, 42(05): 712-716.
[10] 王继斌. 不同截留分子量超滤膜的污染特性及动力学特征[D]: 西安建筑科技大学, 2007.
[11] Ho C, Zydney A L. A combined pore blockage and cake filtration model for protein fouling during microfiltration[J]. J Colloid Interf Sci, 2000, 232(2): 389-399.
[12] Stefan, A., Huber, et al. Characterisation of aquatic humic and non-humic matter with size-exclusion chromatography - organic carbon detection - organic nitrogen detection (LC-OCD-OND)[J]. Water research: A journal of the international water association, 2011, 45(2): 879-885.
[13] Hermans P H. Principles of the mathematical treatment of constant-pressure filtration[J]. J. Soc. Chem. Ind., 1936, 55: 1.
[14] 张启伟, 孙丽华, 吕静静, 等. 不同材质及不同截留分子量超滤膜对二级出水中污染物的去除研究[J]. 工业安全与环保, 2018, 044(009): 13-19.
[15] Shang R, Vuong F, Hu J, et al. Hydraulically irreversible fouling on ceramic MF/UF membranes: Comparison of fouling indices, foulant composition and irreversible pore narrowing[J]. Sep Purif Technol, 2015, 147: 303-310.
[16] Qu F, Liang H, Zhou J, et al. Ultrafiltration membrane fouling caused by extracellular organic matter (EOM) from Microcystis aeruginosa: Effects of membrane pore size and surface hydrophobicity[J]. J Membrane Sci, 2014, 449: 58-66.
[17] Cho J, Amy G, Pellegrino J. Membrane filtration of natural organic matter: Initial comparison of rejection and flux decline characteristics with ultrafiltration and nanofiltration membranes[J]. Water Res, 1999, 33(11): 2517-2526.
[18] Shang R, Verliefde A R D, Hu J, et al. Tight ceramic UF membrane as RO pre-treatment: The role of electrostatic interactions on phosphate rejection[J]. Water Res, 2014, 48: 498-507.
[19] Howe K J, Clark M M. Fouling of microfiltration and ultrafiltration membranes by natural waters[J]. Environ Sci Technol, 2002, 36(16): 3571-3576.

服务与反馈：

【文章下载】【加入收藏】

《膜科学与技术》编辑部地址：北京市朝阳区北三环东路19号蓝星大厦邮政编码：100029 电话：010-64426130/64433466 传真：010-80485372邮箱：mkxyjs@163.com